
Core i7-2920XM

Xeon Bronze 3104
Core i7-2920XM vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2920XM vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2920XM vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2920XM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 85W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon Bronze 3104 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,336 vs 4,383).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3104, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Bronze 3104
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2920XM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌54.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2920XM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Bronze 3104 better than Core i7-2920XM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2920XM vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2920XM
The Core i7-2920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,336 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Xeon Bronze 3104
The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2920XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3104 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2920XM versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 69.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-2920XM (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-2920XM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2920XM scores 4,336 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2920XM vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.
| Feature | Core i7-2920XM | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+106% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+47% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8.25 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+4167% | 6 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 4,336 | 4,383+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2920XM versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3104 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 32 — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-2920XM) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3104). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2920XM) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3104) — the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2920XM) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3104).
| Feature | Core i7-2920XM | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | 2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 768+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-2920XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2920XM) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3104). The Core i7-2920XM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2920XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.
| Feature | Core i7-2920XM | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













