Core i7-2920XM
VS
FX-6130

Core i7-2920XM vs FX-6130

Intel

Core i7-2920XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

FX-6130

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-2920XM is positioned at rank #717 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2920XM

#705
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1015%
#706
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1000%
#707
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
918%
#708
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
914%
#709
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
905%
#711
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
874%
#712
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
838%
#713
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
837%
#714
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
815%
#717
Core i7-2920XM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The FX-6130 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2920XM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2920XMFX-6130
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2920XMFX-6130
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2920XM and FX-6130

Intel

Core i7-2920XM

The Core i7-2920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,336 points. Launch price was $1,096.

AMD

FX-6130

The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2920XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6130 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2920XM versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the FX-6130 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-2920XM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-6130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2920XM scores 4,336 against the FX-6130's 4,353 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-6130. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-2920XMFX-6130
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB+2300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,336
4,353
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-6130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2920XMFX-6130
Socket
PGA988
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2920XM) / not specified (FX-6130). The Core i7-2920XM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the FX-6130 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2920XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.

FeatureCore i7-2920XMFX-6130
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true