Core i7-3517U vs Celeron N2807
Core i7-3517U
Celeron N2807
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3517U is positioned at rank 340 and the Celeron N2807 is on rank 51, so the Celeron N2807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3517U
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2807
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3517U | Celeron N2807 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3517U | Celeron N2807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3517U and Celeron N2807
Core i7-3517U
The Core i7-3517U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,108 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron N2807
The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3517U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N2807's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-3517U versus 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517U (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.58 GHz). The Core i7-3517U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2807 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3517U scores 2,108 against the Celeron N2807's 2,093 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-3517U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517U vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2807.
| Feature | Core i7-3517U | Celeron N2807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+39% | 2.16 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz+20% | 1.58 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,108 | 2,093 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 180 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 320 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3517U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2807 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-3517U versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2807 — the Core i7-3517U supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3517U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-3517U) vs 1 (Celeron N2807). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3517U) vs 4 (Celeron N2807) — the Core i7-3517U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3517U) and SoC (Celeron N2807).
| Feature | Core i7-3517U | Celeron N2807 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3L-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 4 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-3517U) vs VT-x (Celeron N2807). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3517U) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Core i7-3517U rivals AMD A10-4655M; Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.
| Feature | Core i7-3517U | Celeron N2807 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Netbook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-3517U and Celeron N2807
