Core i7-3517UE vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3517UE vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3517UE vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3517UE

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($330 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,384).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3517UE better than Core m7-6Y75?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core m7-6Y75 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3517UE pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3517UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3517UE is the better buy right now. Core i7-3517UE comes in $63 cheaper on MSRP at $330 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core m7-6Y75 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.1% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3517UE vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3517UE

The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3517UE and Core m7-6Y75 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-3517UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3517UE scores 2,384 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-3517UE. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-3517UE	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+42%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,384	2,363

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3517UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3517UE	Core m7-6Y75
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-3517UE was priced at $330, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($330 vs $393), Core i7-3517UE was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3517UE delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Core i7-3517UE the 18.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-3517UE	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$330-16%	$393
Performance per Dollar	7.2+20%	6.0
Release Date	2012	2015

Search Core i7-3517UE on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.