
Core i7-3517UE

Pentium P6200
Core i7-3517UE vs Pentium P6200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3517UE vs Pentium P6200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3517UE vs Pentium P6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3517UE
2012Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,384 vs 2,394).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($330 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium P6200
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 452.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.9 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $330 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Core i7-3517UE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3517UE better than Pentium P6200?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3517UE vs Pentium P6200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3517UE
The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium P6200
The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3517UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium P6200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 182.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517UE (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core i7-3517UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3517UE scores 2,384 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517UE vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.
| Feature | Core i7-3517UE | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+2054% | 0.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.13 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,384 | 2,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 400 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3517UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3517UE | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-3517UE) / None (Pentium P6200). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core i7-3517UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-3517UE | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3517UE was priced at $330, while the Pentium P6200 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($330 vs $60), Pentium P6200 was $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3517UE delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 39.9 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Pentium P6200 the 138.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3517UE | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $330 | $60-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 39.9+454% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














