Core i7-3610QE
VS
Core i7-4702MQ

Core i7-3610QE vs Core i7-4702MQ

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd37 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3610QE is positioned at rank 945 and the Core i7-4702MQ is on rank 1011, so the Core i7-3610QE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QE

#933
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1765%
#934
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1739%
#935
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1597%
#936
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1590%
#937
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1575%
#939
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1521%
#940
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1458%
#941
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1456%
#942
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1417%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
100%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
97%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4702MQ

#999
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2167%
#1000
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2135%
#1001
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1960%
#1002
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1951%
#1003
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1933%
#1005
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1867%
#1006
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1790%
#1007
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1787%
#1008
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1739%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
99%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
97%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
94%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
92%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3610QE delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4702MQ in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($105)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-4702MQ holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $50 (vs $105), it costs 52% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 108% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i7-3610QE.
InsightCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+108%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($105)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3610QE and Core i7-4702MQ

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3610QE and Core i7-4702MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3610QE (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-3610QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3610QE scores 5,234 against the Core i7-4702MQ's 5,187 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+5%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,234
5,187
Geekbench 6 Single
965
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3610QE uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
Socket
G2
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3610QE) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4702MQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile, Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3610QE launched at $315 MSRP, while the Core i7-4702MQ debuted at $383. At current prices ($105 vs $50), the Core i7-4702MQ is $55 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3610QE delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 103.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-4702MQ — making the Core i7-4702MQ the 70.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i7-4702MQ
MSRP
$315-18%
$383
Avg Price (30d)
$105
$50-52%
Performance per Dollar
49.8
103.7+108%
Release Date
2012
2013