Core i7-3610QE vs Pentium Gold 7505

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold 7505

2 Cores4 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-3610QE vs Pentium Gold 7505 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3610QE vs Pentium Gold 7505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3610QE vs Pentium Gold 7505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3610QE

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Pentium Gold 7505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $315 MSRP, while Pentium Gold 7505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1700% higher power demand at 45W vs 2.5W.

Pentium Gold 7505

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3610QE across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,174 vs 5,234).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3610QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3610QE better than Pentium Gold 7505?
Yes. Core i7-3610QE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 16 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3610QE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.2% more average FPS across 16 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3610QE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-3610QE is the better buy right now. Core i7-3610QE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $315 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 16 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold 7505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3610QE vs Pentium Gold 7505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium Gold 7505

The Pentium Gold 7505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,174 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3610QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Gold 7505 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-3610QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium Gold 7505 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Pentium Gold 7505 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-3610QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Gold 7505 uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i7-3610QE scores 5,234 against the Pentium Gold 7505's 5,174 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE vs 4 MB on the Pentium Gold 7505.

FeatureCore i7-3610QEPentium Gold 7505
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+15%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2.5 MB+900%
Process
22 nm
10 nm SuperFin-55%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
PassMark
5,234+1%
5,174
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3610QE uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold 7505 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3610QEPentium Gold 7505
Socket
G2
FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QE) / not specified (Pentium Gold 7505). The Core i7-3610QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Pentium Gold 7505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-3610QEPentium Gold 7505
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile