Core i7-3612QE vs Processor N100
Core i7-3612QE
Processor N100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3612QE is positioned at rank 1042 and the Processor N100 is on rank 583, so the Processor N100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3612QE
Performance Per Dollar Processor N100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+102%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3612QE and Processor N100
Core i7-3612QE
The Core i7-3612QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,929 points. Launch price was $69.
Processor N100
The Processor N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,869 points. Launch price was $128.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3612QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Processor N100's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QE versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N100 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Processor N100 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i7-3612QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor N100 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3612QE scores 4,929 against the Processor N100's 4,869 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3612QE. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3612QE vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N100.
| Feature | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+2000% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm-55% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 4,929+1% | 4,869 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 640 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3612QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3612QE) / not specified (Processor N100). The Core i7-3612QE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Processor N100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QE targets Industrial/Embedded.
| Feature | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Industrial/Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3612QE launched at $426 MSRP, while the Processor N100 debuted at $128. At current prices ($50 vs $100), the Core i7-3612QE is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3612QE delivers 98.6 pts/$ vs 48.7 pts/$ for the Processor N100 — making the Core i7-3612QE the 67.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3612QE | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $128-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.6+102% | 48.7 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-3612QE and Processor N100
