
Core i7-3615QE

Opteron 6274
Core i7-3615QE vs Opteron 6274 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3615QE vs Opteron 6274 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3615QE vs Opteron 6274: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3615QE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6274 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,617 vs 5,643).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6274, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6274
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6274 better than Core i7-3615QE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3615QE vs Opteron 6274 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3615QE
The Core i7-3615QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,617 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 6274
The Opteron 6274 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,643 points. Launch price was $909.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3615QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6274 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6274 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QE versus 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6274 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-3615QE (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-3615QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6274 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3615QE scores 5,617 against the Opteron 6274's 5,643 — a 0.5% lead for the Opteron 6274. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3615QE vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6274.
| Feature | Core i7-3615QE | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+5% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8.00391 MB (per core)+3102% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,617 | 5,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3615QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6274 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3615QE | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3615QE was priced at $400, while the Opteron 6274 came in at $639. On launch pricing ($400 vs $639), Core i7-3615QE was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3615QE delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 8.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6274 — making the Core i7-3615QE the 45.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3615QE | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-37% | $639 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0+59% | 8.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















