Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1240L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1240L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1240L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3615QE

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,617 vs 5,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1240L v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1240L v3 better than Core i7-3615QE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3615QE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1240L v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1240L v3 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E3-1240L v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-3615QE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1240L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1240L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3615QE

The Core i7-3615QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,617 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240L v3

The Xeon E3-1240L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,681 points. Launch price was $278.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3615QE and Xeon E3-1240L v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QE versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v3 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3615QE (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-3615QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3615QE scores 5,617 against the Xeon E3-1240L v3's 5,681 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1240L v3. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3615QE vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v3.

Feature	Core i7-3615QE	Xeon E3-1240L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,617	5,681+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3615QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.