Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1205 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1205 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1205 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3615QE

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,617 vs 5,682).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1205 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1205 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3615QE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3615QE better than Xeon E3-1205 v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1205 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3615QE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1205 v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3615QE is the better buy right now. Core i7-3615QE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1205 v6 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1205 v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3615QE vs Xeon E3-1205 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3615QE

The Core i7-3615QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,617 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1205 v6

The Xeon E3-1205 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,682 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3615QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1205 v6's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3615QE versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1205 v6 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3615QE (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-3615QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1205 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3615QE scores 5,617 against the Xeon E3-1205 v6's 5,682 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1205 v6. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3615QE vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1205 v6.

Feature	Core i7-3615QE	Xeon E3-1205 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,617	5,682+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3615QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1205 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.