CPU
GPU
Core i7-3770T
Atom x7425E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3770T is positioned at rank 805 and the Atom x7425E is on rank 213, so the Atom x7425E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770T
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7425E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3770T | Atom x7425E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3770T | Atom x7425E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3770T and Atom x7425E
Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.
Atom x7425E
The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3770T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Atom x7425E's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-3770T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom x7425E uses Gracemont (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the Atom x7425E's 5,427 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Atom x7425E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+67% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm-55% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Gracemont (2023) |
| PassMark | 5,403 | 5,427 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,859 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7425E uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3770T versus DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E — the Atom x7425E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3770T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-3770T) vs 1 (Atom x7425E). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3770T) vs 9 (Atom x7425E) — the Core i7-3770T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i7-3770T) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E).
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Atom x7425E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+78% | 9 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3770T) / not specified (Atom x7425E). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770T) and Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) (Atom x7425E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | Atom x7425E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel UHD Graphics (24EU) |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-3770T and Atom x7425E
