
Core i7-3960X

Opteron 6386 SE
Core i7-3960X vs Opteron 6386 SE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3960X vs Opteron 6386 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3960X vs Opteron 6386 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3960X
2011Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $393 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6386 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6386 SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,291 vs 8,402).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($1,392 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3960X better than Opteron 6386 SE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3960X vs Opteron 6386 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3960X
The Core i7-3960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,402 points. Launch price was $861.

Opteron 6386 SE
The Opteron 6386 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $2,408.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3960X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Opteron 6386 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6386 SE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3960X versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 6386 SE — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-3960X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-3960X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3960X scores 8,402 against the Opteron 6386 SE's 8,291 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-3960X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3960X vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6386 SE.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 16+167% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+11% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+88% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 16 MB+6300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,402+1% | 8,291 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 658 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3960X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3960X) / not specified (Opteron 6386 SE).
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3960X was priced at $999, while the Opteron 6386 SE came in at $1392. On launch pricing ($999 vs $1392), Core i7-3960X was $393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3960X delivers 8.4 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 6386 SE — making the Core i7-3960X the 34.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3960X | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-28% | $1392 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4+40% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















