Core i7-3970X vs Core i7-8809G

Intel

Core i7-3970X

6 Cores12 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-8809G

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-3970X

2012

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $540 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
  • Delivers 117.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,554).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8809G better than Core i7-3970X?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-8809G is ahead with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3970X pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i7-3970X also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3970X is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-8809G is the smarter buy today. Core i7-8809G is $540 cheaper on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $990 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-3970X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 117.3% better value on MSRP (18.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8809G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
1080p
low169 FPS188 FPS
medium144 FPS149 FPS
high116 FPS119 FPS
ultra96 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low141 FPS151 FPS
medium119 FPS118 FPS
high93 FPS93 FPS
ultra76 FPS74 FPS
4K
low64 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS59 FPS
high45 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
1080p
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium206 FPS211 FPS
high186 FPS211 FPS
ultra151 FPS191 FPS
1440p
low209 FPS211 FPS
medium181 FPS211 FPS
high164 FPS198 FPS
ultra136 FPS169 FPS
4K
low164 FPS208 FPS
medium144 FPS176 FPS
high128 FPS146 FPS
ultra95 FPS121 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
1080p
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS
1440p
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS
4K
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
1080p
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS
1440p
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS
4K
low214 FPS211 FPS
medium214 FPS211 FPS
high214 FPS211 FPS
ultra214 FPS211 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3970X and Core i7-8809G

Intel

Core i7-3970X

The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.

Intel

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3970X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-8809G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3970X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-3970X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-8809G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3970X scores 8,554 against the Core i7-8809G's 8,448 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3970X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G.

FeatureCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+13%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+88%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake G (2018)
PassMark
8,554+1%
8,448
Geekbench 6 Single
742
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3970X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-8809G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
Socket
LGA2011
FCBGA2270
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3970X) / not specified (Core i7-8809G). Primary use case: Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.

FeatureCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3970X launched at $990 MSRP, while the Core i7-8809G debuted at $450. On MSRP ($990 vs $450), the Core i7-8809G is $540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3970X delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-8809G — making the Core i7-8809G the 73.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3970XCore i7-8809G
MSRP
$990
$450-55%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
18.8+119%
Release Date
2012
2018