
Core i7-3970X
Popular choices:

Core i7-8809G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-3970X
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Core i7-8809G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,554).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
Core i7-3970X
2012Core i7-8809G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,554).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-8809G better than Core i7-3970X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3970X and Core i7-8809G

Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X
The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.

Core i7-8809G
Core i7-8809G
The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3970X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-8809G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3970X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-3970X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-8809G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3970X scores 8,554 against the Core i7-8809G's 8,448 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3970X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+88% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Kaby Lake G (2018) |
| PassMark | 8,554+1% | 8,448 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 742 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3970X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-8809G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FCBGA2270 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3970X) / not specified (Core i7-8809G). Primary use case: Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3970X launched at $990 MSRP, while the Core i7-8809G debuted at $450. On MSRP ($990 vs $450), the Core i7-8809G is $540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3970X delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-8809G — making the Core i7-8809G the 73.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Core i7-8809G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $990 | $450-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 18.8+119% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












