Core i7-3970X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Intel

Core i7-3970X

6 Cores12 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-3970X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3970X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3970X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3970X

2012

Why buy it

  • +275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 44.2 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • 130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $797 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
  • Delivers 411.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.2 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,527 vs 8,554).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3970X better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
Yes. Core i7-3970X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3970X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3970X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-3970X is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-3970X comes in 413.0% more expensive on MSRP at $990 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 8,527 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3970X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-3970X

The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3970X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3970X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3970X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-3970X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3970X scores 8,554 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3970X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

FeatureCore i7-3970XRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+3%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+275%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
8,554
8,527
Geekbench 6 Single
742
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3970X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3970XRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Socket
LGA2011
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3970X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). Primary use case: Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.

FeatureCore i7-3970XRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-3970X was priced at $990, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($990 vs $193), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was $797 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3970X delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 44.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G the 134.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3970XRyzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP
$990
$193-81%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
44.2+414%
Release Date
2012
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.