
Core i7-1160G7
Popular choices:

Core i7-3970X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+136.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $564 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i7-3970X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
Core i7-3970X
2012Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅900% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (742 vs 1,758).
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,554 vs 8,720).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Core i7-3970X
2012Why buy it
- ✅+136.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $564 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i7-3970X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅900% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (742 vs 1,758).
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,554 vs 8,720).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Core i7-3970X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1160G7 and Core i7-3970X

Core i7-1160G7
Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X
The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1160G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-3970X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-3970X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-3970X uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Core i7-3970X's 8,554 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-1160G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,758 vs 742, a 81.3% lead for the Core i7-1160G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+192% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 8,720+2% | 8,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,758+137% | 742 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3970X uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3970X — the Core i7-1160G7 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3970X supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-1160G7) vs 4 (Core i7-3970X). PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i7-1160G7) vs 40 (Core i7-3970X) — the Core i7-3970X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7) and X79 (Core i7-3970X).
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1598 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 40+900% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i7-3970X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet, Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U; Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet | HEDT Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-1160G7 launched at $426 MSRP, while the Core i7-3970X debuted at $990. On MSRP ($426 vs $990), the Core i7-1160G7 is $564 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1160G7 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-3970X — making the Core i7-1160G7 the 81.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Core i7-3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426-57% | $990 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+138% | 8.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












