Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E3-1240 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E3-1240 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E3-1240 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1160G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 72W, a 57W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E3-1240 v6 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,720 vs 8,731).
❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1240 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌380% higher power demand at 72W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Xeon E3-1240 v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1160G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240 v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1160G7 is the better buy right now. Core i7-1160G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $426 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240 v6 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1160G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Xeon E3-1240 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1160G7

The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E3-1240 v6

The Xeon E3-1240 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,731 points. Launch price was $272.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1160G7 and Xeon E3-1240 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v6 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E3-1240 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Xeon E3-1240 v6's 8,731 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v6. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1240 v6.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E3-1240 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+7%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+208%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	8,720	8,731
Geekbench 6 Single	1,758	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Xeon E3-1240 v6
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v6). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E3-1240 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.