Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-1160G7

Intel

Core i3-10105F

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i7-1160G7

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020

Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-1160G7 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-1160G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-1160G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+2.2% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Costs $329 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 348.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • βœ…300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1160G7.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,461 vs 1,758).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1160G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-1160G7

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…+20.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i3-10105F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (8,720 vs 8,912).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105F better than Core i7-1160G7?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-1160G7 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark. Core i7-1160G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10105F is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105F comes in $329 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-1160G7 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 348.8% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-1160G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Intel

Core i7-1160G7

The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020βˆ’2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105F and Core i7-1160G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020βˆ’2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Core i7-1160G7's 8,720 β€” a 2.2% lead for the Core i3-10105F. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,461 vs 1,758, a 18.5% lead for the Core i7-1160G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7.

FeatureCore i3-10105FCore i7-1160G7
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+208%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
14 nm
10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake-R (2021)
Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020βˆ’2021)
PassMark
8,912+2%
8,720
Geekbench 6 Single
1,461
1,758+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,503
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105F versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 β€” the Core i7-1160G7 supports 60.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10105F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β€” 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 4 (Core i7-1160G7) β€” the Core i3-10105F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7).

FeatureCore i3-10105FCore i7-1160G7
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA1598
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
LPDDR4x-4267+60%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i3-10105F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.

FeatureCore i3-10105FCore i7-1160G7
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
β€”
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
β€”
Premium Ultrabook/Tablet
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Core i7-1160G7 came in at $426. On launch pricing ($97 vs $426), Core i3-10105F was $329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-1160G7 β€” making the Core i3-10105F the 127.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10105FCore i7-1160G7
MSRP
$97-77%
$426
Performance per Dollar
91.9+348%
20.5
Release Date
2021
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.