Core i3-10105F vs Processor U300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105F vs Processor U300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105F vs Processor U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor U300.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Processor U300

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 8,912).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105F better than Processor U300?

Yes. Core i3-10105F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10105F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105F is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105F comes in $96 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 99.3% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-10105F vs Processor U300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Processor U300

The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor U300 uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Processor U300's 8,897 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-10105F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Processor U300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	5 / 6+25%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+208%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Raptor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark	8,912	8,897
Geekbench 6 Single	1,461	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,503	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Processor U300
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) / not specified (Processor U300).

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Processor U300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Processor U300 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($97 vs $193), Core i3-10105F was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Processor U300 — making the Core i3-10105F the 66.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Processor U300
MSRP	$97-50%	$193
Performance per Dollar	91.9+99%	46.1
Release Date	2021	2023

Search Core i3-10105F on Amazon

Search Processor U300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.