Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-4648 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-4648 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4648 V3.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4648 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,912 vs 9,061).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4648 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.6 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4648 V3 better than Core i3-10105F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4648 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10105F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4648 V3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4648 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4648 V3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-10105F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4648 V3 comes in 74.2% more expensive on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $97 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10105F is also 71.4% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 53.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-4648 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

The Xeon E5-4648 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,061 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4648 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Xeon E5-4648 V3's 9,061 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-4648 V3. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4648 V3.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+100%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+118%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	8,912	9,061+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,461	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,503	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) / not specified (Xeon E5-4648 V3).

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($97 vs $169), Core i3-10105F was $72 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 53.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — making the Core i3-10105F the 52.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-4648 V3
MSRP	$97-43%	$169
Performance per Dollar	91.9+71%	53.6
Release Date	2021	2015

Search Core i3-10105F on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4648 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.