Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-2670

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-2670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-2670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,455 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1502.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2670.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2670

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,901 vs 8,912).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105F better than Xeon E5-2670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-10105F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10105F is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105F comes in $1,455 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2670 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1502.0% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10105F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-2670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Xeon E5-2670

The Xeon E5-2670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,901 points. Launch price was $145.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Xeon E5-2670's 8,901 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-10105F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-2670
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+33%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	8,912	8,901
Geekbench 6 Single	1,461	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,503	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105F versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2670 — the Core i3-10105F supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-10105F) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670) — the Xeon E5-2670 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670).

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-2670
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	384 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2670 targets Server.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-2670
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Xeon E5-2670 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($97 vs $1552), Core i3-10105F was $1455 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 — making the Core i3-10105F the 176.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-10105F	Xeon E5-2670
MSRP	$97-94%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	91.9+1512%	5.7
Release Date	2021	2012

Search Core i3-10105F on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.