Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 1500X

Intel

Core i3-10105F

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 1500X

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Ryzen family
·······

Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 1500X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 1500X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 1500X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10105F

2021

Why buy it

  • +21.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • Costs $92 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
  • Delivers 91.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 1500X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 1500X

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,700 vs 4,503).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105F better than Ryzen 5 1500X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 1500X is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F pulls ahead with 21.7% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 5 1500X also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105F is the stronger fit. You are getting 21.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10105F is the better buy right now. Core i3-10105F comes in $92 cheaper on MSRP at $97 MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you 21.7% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 1500X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 91.4% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 48.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 1500X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 1500X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

AMD

Ryzen 5 1500X

The Ryzen 5 1500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,074 points. Launch price was $189.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 5 1500X share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1500X — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 1500X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Ryzen 5 1500X's 9,074 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 1500X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,461 vs 1,120, a 26.4% lead for the Core i3-10105F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,503 vs 3,700 (19.6% advantage for the Core i3-10105F). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1500X.

FeatureCore i3-10105FRyzen 5 1500X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+19%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+6%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-R (2021)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
8,912
9,074+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,641
Geekbench 6 Single
1,461+30%
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,503+22%
3,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 1500X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i3-10105F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 1500X) — the Ryzen 5 1500X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 1500X).

FeatureCore i3-10105FRyzen 5 1500X
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 1500X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 1500X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 1500X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 1500X rivals Core i5-7500.

FeatureCore i3-10105FRyzen 5 1500X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Ryzen 5 1500X came in at $189. On launch pricing ($97 vs $189), Core i3-10105F was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 1500X — making the Core i3-10105F the 62.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10105FRyzen 5 1500X
MSRP
$97-49%
$189
Performance per Dollar
91.9+91%
48.0
Release Date
2021
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.