
Core i3-10105F

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10105F
2021Why buy it
- β Costs $92 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- β Delivers 91.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 47.9 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 1500.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,912 vs 9,062).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 47.9 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 better than Core i3-10105F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105F
The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.


Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,062 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 β a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 uses Zen (2017β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500's 9,062 β a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 8,912 | 9,062+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,461 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,503 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 1500).
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 came in at $189. On launch pricing ($97 vs $189), Core i3-10105F was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 47.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 β making the Core i3-10105F the 62.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $97-49% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.9+92% | 47.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













