PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Core i7-7700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Core i7-7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1160G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-1160G7.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,642 vs 8,720).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Core i7-7700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7700 is ahead with a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1160G7 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-1160G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1160G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1160G7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-1160G7 comes in 56.6% more expensive on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-7700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 55.2% better value on paper (31.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1160G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1160G7 vs Core i7-7700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1160G7

The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1160G7 and Core i7-7700 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-7700 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Core i7-7700's 8,642 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-1160G7. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Core i7-7700
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+5%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	8,720	8,642
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,435
Geekbench 6 Single	1,758	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-7700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700 — the Core i7-1160G7 supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-7700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i7-1160G7) vs 16 (Core i7-7700) — the Core i7-7700 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7) and 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700).

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Core i7-7700
Socket	FCBGA1598	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267+78%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i7-1160G7) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet, Core i7-7700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U; Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Core i7-7700
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Premium Ultrabook/Tablet	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-1160G7 was priced at $426, while the Core i7-7700 came in at $272. On launch pricing ($426 vs $272), Core i7-7700 was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1160G7 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 31.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7700 — making the Core i7-7700 the 43.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-1160G7	Core i7-7700
MSRP	$426	$272-36%
Performance per Dollar	20.5	31.8+55%
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Core i7-1160G7 on Amazon

Search Core i7-7700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.