
Core i7-1160G7

Ryzen 5 2400G
Core i7-1160G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-1160G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-1160G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+69% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,720 vs 8,734).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.
Ryzen 5 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $257 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core i7-1160G7.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,040 vs 1,758).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Ryzen 5 2400G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-1160G7 vs Ryzen 5 2400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.


Ryzen 5 2400G
The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-1160G7 and Ryzen 5 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Ryzen 5 2400G's 8,734 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 2400G. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,758 vs 1,040, a 51.3% lead for the Core i7-1160G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,720 | 8,734 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,758+69% | 1,040 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,250 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 5 2400G — the Core i7-1160G7 supports 45.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 2400G supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i7-1160G7) vs 12 (Ryzen 5 2400G) — the Ryzen 5 2400G offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 5 2400G).
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1598 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267+45% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 12+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 2400G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i7-1160G7) and Radeon RX Vega 11 (Ryzen 5 2400G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet, Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet | Entry Gaming Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-1160G7 was priced at $426, while the Ryzen 5 2400G came in at $169. On launch pricing ($426 vs $169), Ryzen 5 2400G was $257 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1160G7 delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 51.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2400G — making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 86.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $169-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5 | 51.7+152% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














