
Core i7-3970X vs Xeon E5-2428L

Core i7-3970X

Xeon E5-2428L
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3970X is positioned at rank 1020 and the Xeon E5-2428L is on rank 800, so the Xeon E5-2428L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3970X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2428L
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+42%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3970X and Xeon E5-2428L

Core i7-3970X
The Core i7-3970X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,554 points. Launch price was $593.

Xeon E5-2428L
The Xeon E5-2428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,500 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3970X and Xeon E5-2428L share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-3970X versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2428L — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3970X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-3970X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3970X scores 8,554 against the Xeon E5-2428L's 8,500 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-3970X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3970X vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2428L.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+94% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,554 | 8,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 742 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3970X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3970X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2428L). Primary use case: Core i7-3970X targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3970X rivals FX-9590.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3970X launched at $990 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2428L debuted at $692. At current prices ($60 vs $42), the Xeon E5-2428L is $18 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3970X delivers 142.6 pts/$ vs 202.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2428L — making the Xeon E5-2428L the 34.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3970X | Xeon E5-2428L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $990 | $692-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $42-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 142.6 | 202.4+42% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











