Core i7-4700MQ
VS
Core i7-4700EQ

Core i7-4700MQ vs Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4700MQ is positioned at rank 1000 and the Core i7-4700EQ is on rank 994, so the Core i7-4700EQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ

#988
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2100%
#989
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2069%
#990
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1900%
#991
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1891%
#992
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1874%
#994
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1810%
#995
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1735%
#996
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1732%
#997
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1686%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
97%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
95%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
95%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700EQ

#982
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2047%
#983
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2017%
#984
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1852%
#985
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1844%
#986
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1827%
#988
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1764%
#989
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1692%
#990
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1689%
#991
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1643%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
100%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
100%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
98%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
98%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
95%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-4700EQ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4700MQ in both compute-intensive tasks (1.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-4700MQ holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $50 (vs $180), it costs 72% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 255% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i7-4700EQ.
InsightCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+255%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4700MQ and Core i7-4700EQ

Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.

Intel

Core i7-4700EQ

The Core i7-4700EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,417 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4700MQ and Core i7-4700EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700EQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-4700MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4700MQ scores 5,349 against the Core i7-4700EQ's 5,417 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-4700EQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-4700EQ.

FeatureCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,349
5,417+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4700MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700EQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
Socket
PGA946
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4700MQ) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4700EQ). The Core i7-4700EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-4700MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4700EQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4700MQ launched at $383 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700EQ debuted at $378. At current prices ($50 vs $180), the Core i7-4700MQ is $130 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4700MQ delivers 107.0 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700EQ — making the Core i7-4700MQ the 112.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4700MQCore i7-4700EQ
MSRP
$383
$378-1%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-72%
$180
Performance per Dollar
107.0+255%
30.1
Release Date
2013
2013