Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i7-6822EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i7-6822EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i7-6822EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4710HQ

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,549 vs 5,550).
❌88% higher power demand at 47W vs 25W.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 47W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-4710HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6822EQ better than Core i7-4710HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4710HQ is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6822EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-6822EQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4710HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6822EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Core i7-6822EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4710HQ

The Core i7-4710HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,549 points. Launch price was $378.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4710HQ and Core i7-6822EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710HQ versus 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4710HQ. The Core i7-4710HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6822EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710HQ scores 5,549 against the Core i7-6822EQ's 5,550 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-6822EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710HQ vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ.

Feature	Core i7-4710HQ	Core i7-6822EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,549	5,550
Geekbench 6 Single	—	684
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,796

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4710HQ versus DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i7-6822EQ — the Core i7-6822EQ supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-6822EQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i7-4710HQ	Core i7-6822EQ
Socket	BGA1364	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4710HQ) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4710HQ) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6822EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710HQ targets Mobile, Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-4710HQ	Core i7-6822EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	Mobile	Embedded