Core i7-4710HQ vs Opteron 6376

Core i7-4710HQ vs Opteron 6376 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4710HQ

4 / 8

5,549

0.0%

5,572

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Opteron 6376 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Opteron 6376: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4710HQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron 6376 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6376 across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,549 vs 5,572).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6376, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6376

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $703 MSRP, while Core i7-4710HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6376 better than Core i7-4710HQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6376 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4710HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6376 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6376 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6376 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6376 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $703 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4710HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4710HQ vs Opteron 6376 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4710HQ

The Core i7-4710HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,549 points. Launch price was $378.

Opteron 6376

The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4710HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6376 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4710HQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-4710HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6376 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710HQ scores 5,549 against the Opteron 6376's 5,572 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6376. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4710HQ	Opteron 6376
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+1500%	16 MB
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	5,549	5,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4710HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6376 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4710HQ	Opteron 6376
Socket	BGA1364	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4710HQ) / not specified (Opteron 6376). The Core i7-4710HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6376 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710HQ targets Mobile.