
Core i7-4710HQ
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 2300U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4710HQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen 3 2300U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 2300U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,484 vs 5,549).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4710HQ
2014Ryzen 3 2300U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen 3 2300U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,484 vs 5,549).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4710HQ better than Ryzen 3 2300U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4710HQ and Ryzen 3 2300U

Core i7-4710HQ
Core i7-4710HQ
The Core i7-4710HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,549 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen 3 2300U
Ryzen 3 2300U
The Ryzen 3 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4710HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 2300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710HQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300U — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4710HQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-4710HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710HQ scores 5,549 against the Ryzen 3 2300U's 5,484 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4710HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300U.
| Feature | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,549+1% | 5,484 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4710HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4710HQ) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300U). The Core i7-4710HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen 3 2300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710HQ targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-4710HQ | Ryzen 3 2300U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













