
Core i7-4770R

FX-8120
Core i7-4770R vs FX-8120 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4770R vs FX-8120 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4770R vs FX-8120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4770R
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 47W instead of 125W, a 78W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while FX-8120 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (6,561 vs 6,594).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 32.2 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $205 MSRP).
FX-8120
2011Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Costs $155 less on MSRP ($205 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
- β Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.2 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($205 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β166% higher power demand at 125W vs 47W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-8120 better than Core i7-4770R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4770R vs FX-8120 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770R
The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-8120
The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011β2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4770R packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8120 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the FX-8120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770R versus 4 GHz on the FX-8120 β a 2.5% clock advantage for the FX-8120 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-4770R uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-8120 uses Zambezi (2011β2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770R scores 6,561 against the FX-8120's 6,594 β a 0.5% lead for the FX-8120. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4770R vs 8192 kB on the FX-8120.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Zambezi (2011β2012) |
| PassMark | 6,561 | 6,594 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,204 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4770R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-4770R) / not specified (FX-8120). The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the FX-8120 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | Yes | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4770R was priced at $360, while the FX-8120 came in at $205. On launch pricing ($360 vs $205), FX-8120 was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770R delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 32.2 pts/$ for the FX-8120 β making the FX-8120 the 55.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $360 | $205-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 32.2+77% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















