Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E7340

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770R

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 47W instead of 80W, a 33W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while Xeon E7340 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $147 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
✅Delivers 68.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4770R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,544 vs 6,561).
❌70.2% higher power demand at 80W vs 47W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4770R better than Xeon E7340?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4770R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4770R is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4770R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4770R is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7340 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4770R comes in 69.0% more expensive on MSRP at $360 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7340 is also 68.6% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4770R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770R

The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4770R is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4770R scores 6,561 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4770R. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4770R vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

Feature	Core i7-4770R	Xeon E7340
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	6,561	6,544
Geekbench 6 Single	1,163	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,204	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4770R	Xeon E7340
Socket	BGA1364	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-4770R) / not specified (Xeon E7340). The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Xeon E7340 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-4770R	Xeon E7340
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770R was priced at $360, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($360 vs $213), Xeon E7340 was $147 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770R delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Xeon E7340 the 51.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4770R	Xeon E7340
MSRP	$360	$213-41%
Performance per Dollar	18.2	30.7+69%
Release Date	2013	2007

Search Core i7-4770R on Amazon

Search Xeon E7340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.