Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-2623 v3

Intel

Core i7-4770R

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2623 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-2623 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770R

2013

Why buy it

  • +29.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Costs $84 less on MSRP ($360 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
  • Delivers 21.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.2 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $444 MSRP).
  • Draws 47W instead of 105W, a 58W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while Xeon E5-2623 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,204 vs 3,683).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2623 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2623 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +15% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (899 vs 1,163).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($444 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
  • 123.4% higher power demand at 105W vs 47W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4770R better than Xeon E5-2623 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2623 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4770R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2623 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 15% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4770R is the better buy right now. Core i7-4770R comes in $84 cheaper on MSRP at $360 MSRP versus $444 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2623 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 15% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 21.6% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2623 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-2623 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4770R

The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2623 v3

The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,652 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4770R and Xeon E5-2623 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770R versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4770R (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-4770R uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770R scores 6,561 against the Xeon E5-2623 v3's 6,652 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2623 v3. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,163 vs 899, a 25.6% lead for the Core i7-4770R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,204 vs 3,683 (13.9% advantage for the Xeon E5-2623 v3). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4770R vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2623 v3.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-2623 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+11%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
6,561
6,652+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,163+29%
899
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,204
3,683+15%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4770R versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — the Xeon E5-2623 v3 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2623 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-4770R) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2623 v3). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-4770R) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2623 v3) — the Xeon E5-2623 v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,Z97 (Core i7-4770R) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2623 v3).

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-2623 v3
Socket
BGA1364
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
768 GB+2300%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
40+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support Yes virtualization. The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2623 v3 targets Server.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-2623 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
Yes
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770R was priced at $360, while the Xeon E5-2623 v3 came in at $444. On launch pricing ($360 vs $444), Core i7-4770R was $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770R delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 15.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2623 v3 — making the Core i7-4770R the 19.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-2623 v3
MSRP
$360-19%
$444
Performance per Dollar
18.2+21%
15.0
Release Date
2013
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.