
Core i7-4770R

Xeon E5-1620 v2
Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4770R
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 130W, a 83W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while Xeon E5-1620 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,523 vs 6,561).
- ❌176.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4770R better than Xeon E5-1620 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4770R
The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1620 v2
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-4770R and Xeon E5-1620 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-4770R uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770R scores 6,561 against the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 6,523 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4770R. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4770R vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| PassMark | 6,561 | 6,523 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,204 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4770R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-4770R) / not specified (Xeon E5-1620 v2). The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4770R was priced at $360, while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($360 vs $294), Xeon E5-1620 v2 was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770R delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 22.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v2 the 19.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4770R | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $360 | $294-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 22.2+22% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















