Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

Intel

Core i7-4770R

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4770R

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 47W instead of 130W, a 83W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 5200, while Xeon E5-1620 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($360 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Xeon E5-1620 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Costs $66 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).
  • Delivers 21.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $360 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,523 vs 6,561).
  • 176.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 47W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4770R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4770R better than Xeon E5-1620 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1620 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4770R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4770R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4770R is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1620 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4770R comes in 22.4% more expensive on MSRP at $360 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1620 v2 is also 21.7% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 18.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4770R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4770R vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4770R

The Core i7-4770R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,561 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4770R and Xeon E5-1620 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4770R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-4770R uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4770R scores 6,561 against the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 6,523 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-4770R. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4770R vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-1620 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
6,561
6,523
Geekbench 6 Single
1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,204
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4770R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-1620 v2
Socket
BGA1364
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-4770R) / not specified (Xeon E5-1620 v2). The Core i7-4770R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 5200), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-1620 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4770R was priced at $360, while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($360 vs $294), Xeon E5-1620 v2 was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4770R delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 22.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v2 the 19.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4770RXeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP
$360
$294-18%
Performance per Dollar
18.2
22.2+22%
Release Date
2013
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.