Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-7820HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-7820HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-7820HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4771

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-7820HQ needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-7820HQ.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,141 vs 7,184).
❌Launch MSRP is still $320 MSRP, while Core i7-7820HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.

Core i7-7820HQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4771 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-4771.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820HQ better than Core i7-4771?

Yes. Core i7-7820HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820HQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7820HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $320 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4771 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7820HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-7820HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4771

The Core i7-4771 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,141 points. Launch price was $450.

Core i7-7820HQ

The Core i7-7820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,184 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4771 and Core i7-7820HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4771 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-4771 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-7820HQ uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4771 scores 7,141 against the Core i7-7820HQ's 7,184 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-7820HQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4771	Core i7-7820HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark	7,141	7,184
Geekbench 6 Single	1,139	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,910	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4771 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7820HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4771	Core i7-7820HQ
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4771) / not specified (Core i7-7820HQ). The Core i7-4771 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-7820HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4771 targets Desktop.