
Core i7-4771

Xeon W3690
Core i7-4771 vs Xeon W3690 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4771 vs Xeon W3690 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4771 vs Xeon W3690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4771
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $263 less on MSRP ($320 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($320 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon W3690 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,141 vs 7,191).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3690, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W3690
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $320 MSRP).
- ❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4771 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-4771.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4771 better than Xeon W3690?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4771 vs Xeon W3690 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4771
The Core i7-4771 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,141 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon W3690
The Xeon W3690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,191 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4771 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3690 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3690 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4771 versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon W3690 — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4771 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Core i7-4771 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3690 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4771 scores 7,141 against the Xeon W3690's 7,191 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W3690. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4771 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3690.
| Feature | Core i7-4771 | Xeon W3690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.73 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+1% | 3.46 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 7,141 | 7,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,139 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,910 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4771 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3690 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4771 | Xeon W3690 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4771) / not specified (Xeon W3690). The Core i7-4771 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3690 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4771 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-4771 | Xeon W3690 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4771 was priced at $320, while the Xeon W3690 came in at $583. On launch pricing ($320 vs $583), Core i7-4771 was $263 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4771 delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W3690 — making the Core i7-4771 the 57.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4771 | Xeon W3690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $320-45% | $583 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3+81% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














