
Core i7-4900MQ

Ryzen 5 5600X
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4900MQ
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (6,146 vs 21,845).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +74.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Costs $271 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- β Delivers 577.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i7-4900MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4900MQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4900MQ
The Core i7-4900MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,146 points. Launch price was $568.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4900MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4900MQ versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X β a 19% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-4900MQ uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4900MQ scores 6,146 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 β a 112.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4900MQ vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 6,146 | 21,845+255% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4900MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4900MQ) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4900MQ was priced at $570, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($570 vs $299), Ryzen 5 5600X was $271 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4900MQ delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X β making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 148.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4900MQ | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $570 | $299-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 73.1+577% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














