Core i7-4930MX vs Opteron 6282 SE

Core i7-4930MX vs Opteron 6282 SE Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4930MX

4 / 8

6,387

0.0%

6,385

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4930MX vs Opteron 6282 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4930MX vs Opteron 6282 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4930MX

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 57W instead of 140W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6282 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,387).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,019 MSRP, while Core i7-4930MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌145.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 57W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4930MX better than Opteron 6282 SE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6282 SE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4930MX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4930MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4930MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4930MX is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6282 SE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4930MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,019 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6282 SE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4930MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4930MX vs Opteron 6282 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4930MX

The Core i7-4930MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,387 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4930MX packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6282 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930MX versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930MX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4930MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930MX scores 6,387 against the Opteron 6282 SE's 6,385 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-4930MX. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4930MX	Opteron 6282 SE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+18%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	6,387	6,385

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4930MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.