Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2608L V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2608L V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2608L V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4930MX

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,387 vs 6,415).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2608L V3, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.

Xeon E5-2608L V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
✅Draws 52W instead of 57W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4930MX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2608L V3 better than Core i7-4930MX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2608L V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4930MX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2608L V3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2608L V3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2608L V3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013), 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2608L V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4930MX

The Core i7-4930MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,387 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Xeon E5-2608L V3

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,415 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4930MX packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L V3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930MX versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L V3 — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930MX. The Core i7-4930MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930MX scores 6,387 against the Xeon E5-2608L V3's 6,415 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L V3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930MX vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2608L V3.

Feature	Core i7-4930MX	Xeon E5-2608L V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+95%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	6,387	6,415

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4930MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.