Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2637 v2

Intel

Core i7-4930MX

4 Cores8 Thrd57 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2637 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4930MX

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 57W instead of 130W, a 73W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,387 vs 6,492).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-2637 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • +1.6% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 128.1% higher power demand at 130W vs 57W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2637 v2 better than Core i7-4930MX?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2637 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4930MX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2637 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2637 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2637 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4930MX vs Xeon E5-2637 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4930MX

The Core i7-4930MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,387 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v2

The Xeon E5-2637 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,492 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4930MX and Xeon E5-2637 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930MX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v2 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930MX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-4930MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930MX scores 6,387 against the Xeon E5-2637 v2's 6,492 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930MX vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 v2.

FeatureCore i7-4930MXXeon E5-2637 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
6,387
6,492+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4930MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4930MXXeon E5-2637 v2
Socket
PGA946
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%