Core i7-620M
VS
A8-6500T

Core i7-620M vs A8-6500T

Intel

Core i7-620M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A8-6500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-620M is positioned at rank 262 and the A8-6500T is on rank 557, so the Core i7-620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#250
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
416%
#251
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
410%
#252
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
376%
#253
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#254
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
371%
#256
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
358%
#257
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#258
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
343%
#259
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
334%
#262
Core i7-620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8912%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6471%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1351%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
774%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
764%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
660%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#557
A8-6500T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-620M leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-6500T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-620MA8-6500T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-620MA8-6500T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-620M and A8-6500T

Intel

Core i7-620M

The Core i7-620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,976 points. Launch price was $332.

AMD

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i7-620M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-6500T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-620M versus 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-620M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-620M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-6500T uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620M scores 1,976 against the A8-6500T's 1,983 — a 0.4% lead for the A8-6500T.

FeatureCore i7-620MA8-6500T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+7%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+27%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,976
1,983
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-6500T uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-620M versus 1866 on the A8-6500T — the A8-6500T supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,QM57,HM57,QS57 (Core i7-620M) and FM2 (A8-6500T).

FeatureCore i7-620MA8-6500T
Socket
PGA988
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+13107100%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620M) vs true (A8-6500T). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Core i7-620M) and Radeon HD 8550D (A8-6500T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620M targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-620M rivals Core 2 Duo T9600; A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T.

FeatureCore i7-620MA8-6500T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Radeon HD 8550D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Performance Laptop