Core i7-620M
VS
Phenom II X4 805

Core i7-620M vs Phenom II X4 805

Intel

Core i7-620M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 805

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-620M is positioned at rank 262 and the Phenom II X4 805 is on rank 317, so the Core i7-620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#250
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
416%
#251
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
410%
#252
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
376%
#253
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#254
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
371%
#256
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
358%
#257
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#258
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
343%
#259
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
334%
#262
Core i7-620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 805

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4673%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4416%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3206%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
669%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
383%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
378%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
341%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
331%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
327%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
325%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
323%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
100%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
99%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
99%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
99%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
99%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
97%
#317
Phenom II X4 805
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-620M leads in gaming performance. However, the Phenom II X4 805 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-620MPhenom II X4 805
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-620MPhenom II X4 805
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-620M and Phenom II X4 805

Intel

Core i7-620M

The Core i7-620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,976 points. Launch price was $332.

AMD

Phenom II X4 805

The Phenom II X4 805 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,001 points. Launch price was $174.

Processing Power

The Core i7-620M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 805 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 805 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-620M versus 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X4 805 — a 28.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-620M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-620M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X4 805 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620M scores 1,976 against the Phenom II X4 805's 2,001 — a 1.3% lead for the Phenom II X4 805. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-620MPhenom II X4 805
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+33%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+6%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,976
2,001+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 805 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-620MPhenom II X4 805
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620M) / not specified (Phenom II X4 805). The Core i7-620M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X4 805 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620M targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-620M rivals Core 2 Duo T9600.

FeatureCore i7-620MPhenom II X4 805
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Performance Laptop