Core i7-6770HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Core i7-6770HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6770HQ

4 / 8

7,083

0.0%

7,106

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6770HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6770HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6770HQ

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,083 vs 7,106).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6770HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Core i7-6770HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6770HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 better than Core i7-6770HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6770HQ is ahead with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $110 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-6770HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (64.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6770HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6770HQ

The Core i7-6770HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,083 points. Launch price was $434.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6770HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-6770HQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-6770HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6770HQ scores 7,083 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i7-6770HQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Feature	Core i7-6770HQ	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	6 MB	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	7,083	7,106
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,769	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6770HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-6770HQ	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Socket	BGA1440	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-6770HQ) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300). The Core i7-6770HQ includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 requires a dedicated GPU.