Core i7-680UM
VS
Athlon 64 FX-60

Core i7-680UM vs Athlon 64 FX-60

Intel

Core i7-680UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 Cores2 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-680UM is positioned at rank 1036 and the Athlon 64 FX-60 is on rank 1119, so the Core i7-680UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-680UM

#1024
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2453%
#1025
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2417%
#1026
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2219%
#1027
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2209%
#1028
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2189%
#1030
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2114%
#1031
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2027%
#1032
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2023%
#1033
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1969%
#1036
Core i7-680UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
99%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
98%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
97%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
94%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-60

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
266423%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
251744%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
182786%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55066%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43618%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38157%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21855%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21569%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19639%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19638%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19418%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18894%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18630%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18555%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18386%
#1118
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
100%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
100%
#1120
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
99%
#1121
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
96%
#1122
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
88%
#1124
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
86%
#1125
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1126
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
82%
#1127
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
76%
#1131
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
75%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 FX-60 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-680UM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-680UMAthlon 64 FX-60
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toledo (2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-680UMAthlon 64 FX-60
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-680UM and Athlon 64 FX-60

Intel

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-680UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon 64 FX-60's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-60. The Core i7-680UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses Toledo (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-680UM scores 1,196 against the Athlon 64 FX-60's 1,205 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-60. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60.

FeatureCore i7-680UMAthlon 64 FX-60
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
2.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.46 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Toledo (2006)
PassMark
1,196
1,205
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
480
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-680UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-680UMAthlon 64 FX-60
Socket
BGA1288
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-680UM) / None (Athlon 64 FX-60). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast.

FeatureCore i7-680UMAthlon 64 FX-60
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Gaming/Enthusiast