Core i7-680UM
VS
Pentium E5800

Core i7-680UM vs Pentium E5800

Intel

Core i7-680UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium E5800

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-680UM is positioned at rank 1036 and the Pentium E5800 is on rank 821, so the Pentium E5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-680UM

#1024
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2453%
#1025
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2417%
#1026
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2219%
#1027
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2209%
#1028
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2189%
#1030
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2114%
#1031
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2027%
#1032
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2023%
#1033
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1969%
#1036
Core i7-680UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
99%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
98%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
97%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
94%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16768%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15844%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11504%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3466%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2745%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2402%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1375%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1358%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1236%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1236%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1222%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1189%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1173%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1168%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1157%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E5800 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-680UM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-680UMPentium E5800
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-680UMPentium E5800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-680UM and Pentium E5800

Intel

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

Intel

Pentium E5800

The Pentium E5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 November 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $68.

Processing Power

The Core i7-680UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E5800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E5800 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Pentium E5800 (base: 1.46 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-680UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E5800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-680UM scores 1,196 against the Pentium E5800's 1,190 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-680UM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5800.

FeatureCore i7-680UMPentium E5800
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3.2 GHz+26%
Base Clock
1.46 GHz
3.2 GHz+119%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,196
1,190
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-680UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-680UMPentium E5800
Socket
BGA1288
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1