Core i7-680UM vs Turion 64 ML-28

Core i7-680UM vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-680UM

2 / 4

1,196

0.0%

1,201

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-680UM vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-680UM vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-680UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 512W, a 494W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,196 vs 1,201).

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌2744.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-680UM better than Turion 64 ML-28?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-680UM is ahead with 58.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-680UM still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-680UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 58.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-680UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-680UM vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-680UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i7-680UM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 45% clock advantage for the Core i7-680UM. The Core i7-680UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-680UM scores 1,196 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-28. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

Feature	Core i7-680UM	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.53 GHz+58%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.46 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,196	1,201

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-680UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.