Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Core i7-720QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-720QM

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $21 less on MSRP ($364 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,658 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($364 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +489.4% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Delivers 721.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $364 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-720QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 5.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $385 MSRPvs$364 MSRP
  • 111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i7-720QM?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 489.4% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data, 768.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 489.4% more average FPS across 29 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 768.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 5.8% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $364 MSRP, and it still gives you a 489.4% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 721.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009), 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-720QM

The Core i7-720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $546.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Core i7-720QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-720QM versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-720QM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-720QM scores 1,658 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 158.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-720QM vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureCore i7-720QMCore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+75%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+125%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,658
14,397+768%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-720QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-720QM versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-720QM) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureCore i7-720QMCore i7-9700K
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333
DDR4-2666+100%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-720QM) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-720QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-720QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

FeatureCore i7-720QMCore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-720QM was priced at $364, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($364 vs $385), Core i7-720QM was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-720QM delivers 4.6 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 156.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-720QMCore i7-9700K
MSRP
$364-5%
$385
Performance per Dollar
4.6
37.4+713%
Release Date
2009
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.