Core i7-720QM vs Turion II Ultra M620

Core i7-720QM vs Turion II Ultra M620 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-720QM

4 / 8

1,658

0.0%

1,665

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-720QM vs Turion II Ultra M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-720QM vs Turion II Ultra M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-720QM

2009

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,658 vs 1,665).
❌Launch MSRP is still $364 MSRP, while Turion II Ultra M620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Turion II Ultra M620

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M620 better than Core i7-720QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-720QM is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M620 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M620 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion II Ultra M620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $364 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-720QM only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Ultra M620 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-720QM vs Turion II Ultra M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-720QM

The Core i7-720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $546.

Turion II Ultra M620

The Turion II Ultra M620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-720QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Turion II Ultra M620 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-720QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-720QM versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M620 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-720QM. The Core i7-720QM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-720QM scores 1,658 against the Turion II Ultra M620's 1,665 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion II Ultra M620.

Feature	Core i7-720QM	Turion II Ultra M620
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Clarksfield (2009−2010)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,658	1,665

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-720QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.