Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3200U

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7560U

2 / 4

3,760

+0.8%

3,730

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7560U

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, while Ryzen 3 3200U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 3200U

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,730 vs 3,760).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7560U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7560U better than Ryzen 3 3200U?

Yes. Core i7-7560U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7560U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 33 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7560U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7560U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7560U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7560U

The Core i7-7560U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,760 points. Launch price was $415.

Ryzen 3 3200U

The Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,730 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7560U and Ryzen 3 3200U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7560U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200U — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7560U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-7560U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7560U scores 3,760 against the Ryzen 3 3200U's 3,730 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-7560U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7560U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	Core i7-7560U	Ryzen 3 3200U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
PassMark	3,760	3,730

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7560U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7560U	Ryzen 3 3200U
Socket	BGA1356	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-7560U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3200U). The Core i7-7560U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640), while the Ryzen 3 3200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7560U targets Mobile.