Core i7-7700T vs Core i7-7820EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700T vs Core i7-7820EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700T vs Core i7-7820EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700T

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,470 vs 7,517).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7700T better than Core i7-7820EQ?

Yes. Core i7-7700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-7700T comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.5% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 19.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7700T vs Core i7-7820EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700T

The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700T and Core i7-7820EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700T. Both are built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-7700T scores 7,517 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-7700T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Core i7-7820EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+23%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	7,517	7,470
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,605	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,066	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,643	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-7700T) / not specified (Core i7-7820EQ). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-7820EQ requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Core i7-7820EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7700T was priced at $303, while the Core i7-7820EQ came in at $378. On launch pricing ($303 vs $378), Core i7-7700T was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700T delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-7820EQ — making the Core i7-7700T the 22.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP	$303-20%	$378
Performance per Dollar	24.8+25%	19.8
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Core i7-7700T on Amazon

Search Core i7-7820EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.